On the level of legal dogmatics, the identification of an economic Constitution properly understood, as
well as a self-founded and self-founding system, poses some problems, which will be considered here
and which do not seem easily overcome; especially in the light of Hegelian assumptions that often
arise as an implicit presupposition of legal constructions. In any case, in consideration of the fact that
each specific form of State tends to access a precise structure of individual economic rights, so that, in
this way, the problem of defining an economic Constitution could be considered substantially
superfluous, as it is adequately absorbed by the economic characteristics presented by the specific
forms of State.
All this, regardless of the conceptually archetypal structure of the abstract figures of dogmatic
reference, never perfectly detectable in the reality of concrete phenomena.
