Open versus minimally invasive cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC): Results from a multicenter retrospective study
Aim of the study: Recent evidence outlined that not all patients with
mRCC might benefit from CN. However, there is lack of data on
perioperative morbidity after this procedure. We aimed to investigate
the impact of surgical approach on perioperative outcomes and
surgical complications relying on a multicenter international registry.
Materials and methods: Clinical data of 681 patients with mRCC
undergoing CN at 11 centers included in the REgistry of MetAstatic
RCC (REMARCC) from January 2014 to December 2017 were retrospectively collected. Patients with complete data on demographics
and comorbidity profiles were included in final analysis. Study
endpoints were: a) postoperative complications, assessed and
graded using the modified Clavien-Dindo scale, and b) 30th day
readmission rate.
Results: Overall, 369 (54.2%) patients (247 open CN [OCN] and 122
minimally-invasive CN [MICN]) were considered. Patients treated
with OCN had a significantly higher cT stage (p = 0.01), tumor size
(p < 0.0001) and cN stage (p = 0.04). Conversely, there was no
difference in terms of gender, age, Charlson comorbidity index, body
mass index, site of metastasic lesions and baseline hemoglobin level,
LDH level, glomerular filtration rate and calcemia. Lymph node
dissection (LND) rate and renal vein/vena cava thrombectomy were
significantly higher in the OCN compared to the MICN (p < 0.0001 and
p = 0.001, respectively). Median estimated blood loss was significantly
lower in the MICN compared to the OCN group (100 vs 450 cc,
p < 0.0001). The rate of removal of adjacent organs beyond the tumorbearing kidney was not significantly different among the two groups.
Patients with MICN compared to OCN had a significantly lower
intraoperative (10% vs 22.6%, p = 0.004), overall postoperative (18% vs
38.6%, p < 0.0001) and major postoperative (2.5 vs 8.2%, p = 0.03)
complications and lower median length of stay (5 vs 8 days,
p < 0.0001). Perioperative mortality was reported in 3 patients in the
OCN group. Readmission rate was 7.1% in both groups.
Discussion: MICN was feasible and achieved acceptable perioperative
morbidity in selected patients with mRCC. The main study limitation is
the retrospective design with risk of selection and attrition bias.