Mind the gaps: horizontal canopy structure affects the relationship between taxonomic and spectral diversity

Spectral diversity (SD) in reflectance can be used to estimate plant taxonomic diversity (TD) according to the Spectral Variation Hypothesis (SVH). However, contrasting relationships between SD and TD have been reported by different studies. Indeed, multiple factors may affect SD, including spatial and spectral scales, vegetation characteristics and the adopted SD computational method. Here, we tested the SVH over 171 plots within a large and heterogeneous forest area in North-Eastern Italy using Sentinel-2 data, aiming at identifying possible factors affecting the strength and direction of SD-TD relationship. SD was determined using “biodivMapR” (BD) and “rasterdiv” (RD) R packages and 38 possible combinations of SD indices, at both α (within a community) and β (among communities) levels, and computational parameters accounting for spatial and spectral scales. Information on vegetation structure was either retrieved from ground-based or LiDAR data. A Random Forest approach was used to disentangle the relationships between SD, TD and vegetation structure, and to identify the best combination of SD computational parameters. At the α-level, we found negative relationship between TD and SD indices, which was mainly driven by the presence of gaps within the forest canopy. As regards BD, we found that this algorithm reduced background contribution on SD and was able to differentiate major forest types (broadleaves vs conifers), but derived α-SD indices were marginally correlated to α-TD. At the β-level, we observed a statistically significant positive correlation between BD SD indices and TD (maximum r = 0.24). Finally, we found stronger correlations and R2 when SD indices were calculated using smaller computation windows and over a larger pixels extraction area. Our findings suggest that vegetation cover and structure play a major role, with respect to inter-species spectral differences, in determining α-SD, and that SD might better capture differences in species composition at the landscape-level rather than the richness of individual communities