Logo del repository
  1. Home
 
Opzioni

“In patient” medical abortion versus surgical abortion: patient’s satisfaction

Di Carlo, Costantino
•
Savoia, Fabiana
•
Ferrara, Cinzia
altro
CAGNACCI, Angelo
2016
  • journal article

Periodico
GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY
Abstract
Objective: To compare patients’ satisfaction with medical and surgical abortion, implementing the Italian guidelines on medical abortion entailing an “in patient” procedure. Methods: A total of 1832 pregnant chose between surgical (vacuum aspiration) or medical abortion (mifepristone p.o. followed after 3 days by sublingual misoprostol) and expressed their expected satisfaction on a visual analog scale (VAS). A total of 885 women chose surgical and 947 medical abortion. The primary end-point was satisfaction VAS score 20 days after the procedure. Secondary end-points were: difference between pre- and post-abortion VAS score; difference in satisfaction VAS scores according to parity and previous abortion; incidence of side effects. Results: VAS score was high in each group but significantly higher for the 1-day surgical than for the 3-day medical abortion procedure (7.9 ± 1.0 versus 7.2 ± 1.2; p < 0.0001). In the surgical group the VAS score increased after the treatment (6.9 ± 1.6 versus 7.9 ± 1.0, p < 0.0001), while it decreased in the medical group (7.5 ± 1.0 versus 7.2 ± 1.2; p < 0.0001). Multiparous women reported higher satisfaction with medical abortion; women with a previous abortion preferred surgical abortion. Conclusions: Both procedures are considered satisfactory by the patients. Performing medical abortion as a 3-day “in patient” procedure, decreased women’s satisfaction scores from their baseline expectations
Objective: To compare patients’ satisfaction with medical and surgical abortion, implementing the Italian guidelines on medical abortion entailing an “in patient” procedure. Methods: A total of 1832 pregnant chose between surgical (vacuum aspiration) or medical abortion (mifepristone p.o. followed after 3 days by sublingual misoprostol) and expressed their expected satisfaction on a visual analog scale (VAS). A total of 885 women chose surgical and 947 medical abortion. The primary end-point was satisfaction VAS score 20 days after the procedure. Secondary end-points were: difference between pre- and post-abortion VAS score; difference in satisfaction VAS scores according to parity and previous abortion; incidence of side effects. Results: VAS score was high in each group but significantly higher for the 1-day surgical than for the 3-day medical abortion procedure (7.9 ± 1.0 versus 7.2 ± 1.2; p < 0.0001). In the surgical group the VAS score increased after the treatment (6.9 ± 1.6 versus 7.9 ± 1.0, p < 0.0001), while it decreased in the medical group (7.5 ± 1.0 versus 7.2 ± 1.2; p < 0.0001). Multiparous women reported higher satisfaction with medical abortion; women with a previous abortion preferred surgical abortion. Conclusions: Both procedures are considered satisfactory by the patients. Performing medical abortion as a 3-day “in patient” procedure, decreased women’s satisfaction scores from their baseline expectations.
DOI
10.3109/09513590.2016.1149162
WOS
WOS:000387480900015
Archivio
http://hdl.handle.net/11390/1105717
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/scopus/2-s2.0-84961208253
Diritti
closed access
Soggetti
  • medical abortion

  • Mifepristone

  • misoprostol

  • surgical abortion

  • Endocrinology

  • Diabetes and Metaboli...

  • Obstetrics and Gyneco...

Scopus© citazioni
5
Data di acquisizione
Jun 14, 2022
Vedi dettagli
Web of Science© citazioni
4
Data di acquisizione
Mar 24, 2024
google-scholar
Get Involved!
  • Source Code
  • Documentation
  • Slack Channel
Make it your own

DSpace-CRIS can be extensively configured to meet your needs. Decide which information need to be collected and available with fine-grained security. Start updating the theme to match your nstitution's web identity.

Need professional help?

The original creators of DSpace-CRIS at 4Science can take your project to the next level, get in touch!

Realizzato con Software DSpace-CRIS - Estensione mantenuta e ottimizzata da 4Science

  • Impostazioni dei cookie
  • Informativa sulla privacy
  • Accordo con l'utente finale
  • Invia il tuo Feedback