Logo del repository
  1. Home
 
Opzioni

On the shoulders of giants: undertaking a structured literature review in accounting

MASSARO, Maurizio
•
Dumay, John
•
Guthrie, James
2016
  • journal article

Periodico
ACCOUNTING, AUDITING & ACCOUNTABILITY JOURNAL
Abstract
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to present a method for a structured literature review (SLR). An SLR is a method for examining a corpus of scholarly literature, to develop insights, critical reflections, future research paths and research questions. SLRs are common in scientific disciplines dominated by quantitative approaches, but they can be adapted in accounting studies since quantitative and qualitative approaches are commonly accepted. Design/methodology/approach – A literature review, as a piece of academic writing, must have a logical, planned structure. The authors also argue it requires tests based on qualitative and quantitative methods. Therefore, the authors describe ten steps for developing an SLR. Findings – The SLR method is a way that scholars can stand “on the shoulders of giants” and provide insightful and impactful research that is different to the traditional authorship approaches to literature reviews. Research limitations/implications – Traditional literature reviews can have varied results because of a lack of rigour. SLRs use a process that, through a set of rules, potentially offers less bias and more transparency of the execution and measures and techniques of validation and reliability. Practical implications – SLRs provide an approach that can help academics to discover underinvestigated topics and methods, nurturing, therefore, the development of new knowledge areas and research approaches. Originality/value – The paper presents accounting researchers with an opportunity to develop insightful and publishable studies, and also serves as a basis for developing future research agendas in the accounting field. The authors advocate the SLR method especially to higher degree research students and emerging scholars as a way of potentially developing robust and defensible research agendas and questions. Keywords Citation analysis, Validity, Reliability, Structured literature review, Critique, Traditional authorship literature review
DOI
10.1108/AAAJ-01-2015-1939
WOS
WOS:000379763800003
Archivio
http://hdl.handle.net/11390/1085879
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/scopus/2-s2.0-84981517056
Diritti
closed access
Soggetti
  • Citation analysis, Va...

Scopus© citazioni
253
Data di acquisizione
Jun 14, 2022
Vedi dettagli
Web of Science© citazioni
381
Data di acquisizione
Mar 19, 2024
Visualizzazioni
1
Data di acquisizione
Jun 8, 2022
Vedi dettagli
google-scholar
Get Involved!
  • Source Code
  • Documentation
  • Slack Channel
Make it your own

DSpace-CRIS can be extensively configured to meet your needs. Decide which information need to be collected and available with fine-grained security. Start updating the theme to match your nstitution's web identity.

Need professional help?

The original creators of DSpace-CRIS at 4Science can take your project to the next level, get in touch!

Realizzato con Software DSpace-CRIS - Estensione mantenuta e ottimizzata da 4Science

  • Impostazioni dei cookie
  • Informativa sulla privacy
  • Accordo con l'utente finale
  • Invia il tuo Feedback