Introduction: Maximal effort, defined by a respiratory exchange ratio (RER) ≥ 1.10, is crucial for accurate interpretation of cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). Standard tests rely on non-metabolic thresholds, such as peak predicted heart rate (ppHR) ≥ 85 %, double product (DP) ≥ 20,000 bpm*mmHg and peak metabolic equivalent of task (MET) ≥ 5.0. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of non-metabolic thresholds in detecting maximal effort, compared with the RER ≥ 1.10 criterion. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed stable patients who underwent CPET from 2022 to 2023, regardless of test indication, history of heart failure (HF), or medication use. All patients also performed transthoracic echocardiography. Results: Among 239 middle-aged patients (53 ± 14 years, 67 % male), 86 % achieved a RER ≥ 1.10, and 65 % had a diagnosis of HF. Non-metabolic thresholds correctly identified maximal efforts (RER ≥ 1.10) in 75 % of the cases (AUC < 0.600). Misclassified cases were more likely to have a history of atrial fibrillation (AF), paced rhythm, HF, and beta-blockers or RAAS inhibitors use. These patients exhibited lower VO2 peak and higher VE/VCO2 slope. Multivariable analysis identified HF history (OR 4.8, CI 95 % 1.6–15.6, p: 0.005), low resting DP (≤ 7500 mmHg*bpm), and ramp protocol as independent predictors of discordant tests. Conclusion: Non-metabolic thresholds misclassified up to 25 % of tests with RER ≥ 1.10 as non-maximal, potentially leading to inaccurate interpretation. In patients with HF, poor expected functional capacity and low DP, direct referral to CPET-equipped facilities may provide more accurate assessment than relying on non-metabolic thresholds.
