This work presents a comparison about the nonlinear cyclic response of unreinforced masonry structures obtained by using commercial calculation codes and on the base of the type of modeling approaches currently available. In particular, several elastoplastic modeling methodologies are considered, representative of a good part of the state of the art for this type of construction: mechanical-based concentrated plasticity macro-element (Tremuri), macro-element with diffuse fiber-based plasticity for flexure and concentrated springs for shear (SeismoStruct) and macro-element with phenomenological-based concentrated plasticity (NextFEM Designer). The purpose of the present research is to evaluate the ability of the different codes to represent the proper hysteretic response of masonry structures. To this aim, several experimental tests from literature are analyzed and compared; two different masonry panels, characterized by different resistant mechanisms, and an entire perforated wall have been studied through nonlinear cyclic static analyses. The reported comparison, mainly focused on the numerical cyclic behaviour exhibited by each computer program, is conducted on the basis of the path of the cycles obtained and on the amount of dissipated energy.
