Outcomes of loop ileostomy after rectal resection for cancer: A prospective observational multicenter snapshot study from Multidisciplinary Italian Study group for STOmas (MISSTO)

F. Ferrara; G. Rizzo; A. Bondurri; C. Forni; G. Anania; A. Anastasi; G. L. Baiocchi; L. Boccia; D. Cassini; M. Catarci; G. Cestaro; N. Cillara; F. Cobellis; R. De Luca; P. De Nardi; S. Deidda; D. Delogu; M. Fedi; M. C. Giuffrida; U. Grossi; H. Impellizzeri; A. Langone; A. Lauretta; F. Lo Celso; A. Maffioli; M. Manigrasso; C. Marafante; L. Marano; P. Marinello; P. Massucco; D. Merlini; L. Morelli; M. Mozzon; D. P. Pafundi; F. Pata; G. Pellino; R. Peltrini; A. Petrina; D. Piazza; C. Rabuini; A. Resendiz; B. Salmaso; M. Santarelli; G. Sena; L. Siragusa; N. Tamini; V. Tondolo; R. Tutino; A. Vannelli; M. Veltri; L. Vincenti; D. Parini &amp;; MISSTO Snapshot Study Collaborative Group; M. Mastronardi

Outcomes of loop ileostomy after rectal resection for cancer: A prospective observational multicenter snapshot study from Multidisciplinary Italian Study group for STOmas (MISSTO)

F. Ferrara

•

G. Rizzo

•

A. Bondurri

altro

M. Mastronardi

2024

journal article

Periodico

TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY

Abstract

Background: Diverting ileostomy is a common procedure in rectal cancer surgery, but it is sometimes associated with a nonnegligible rate of complications. The primary aim of this study was to analyze the incidence and types of stoma-related complications for ileostomy creation after rectal cancer resection. The secondary aims were to report the indications, the technical details, and the efficacy of stoma care provided by ostomy nurses. Methods: From 15 February to 31 December 2022, consecutive patients who underwent protective ileostomy after anterior rectal cancer resection were enrolled for prospective data collection at 45 Italian colorectal surgery centers. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate factors that influenced the occurrence of stoma-related complications. Results: In all, 287 patients were enrolled in the analysis. The short- and long-term postoperative stoma-related morbidity rates were 33.8% and 29.62%, respectively. The most frequent complications were dehydration (17.77%), peristomal skin dermatitis (13.59%), mucocutaneous separation (8.36%), and stoma retraction (4.18%). At the end of follow-up (median time 9 months), the overall stoma closure rate was 83.97% (241 patients), with a median time to stoma closure of 146 days (range 9-483 days). On multivariate analysis, the presence of a stoma nurse was a significant protective factor against stoma-related complications. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that the creation of a protective ileostomy is associated to a nonnegligible rate of short-term and long-term postoperative stoma-related morbidity, higher than 25%. The most frequent complication is dehydration, and the presence of stoma-specialized nurses seems to be a protective factor for stoma-related complications. Moreover, more than 15% of protective stomas were not closed at the end of follow-up.