Logo del repository
  1. Home
 
Opzioni

Fractional Flow Reserve–Guided Deferred Versus Complete Revascularization in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus

Kennedy M. W.
•
Hermanides R. S.
•
Kaplan E.
altro
Kedhi E.
2016
  • journal article

Periodico
THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY
Abstract
To assess the safety and efficacy of deferred versus complete revascularization using a fractional flow reserve (FFR)–guided strategy in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM), we analyzed all DM patients who underwent FFR-guided revascularization from January 1, 2010, to December 12, 2013. Patients were divided into 2 groups: those with ≥1 remaining FFR-negative (>0.80) medically treated lesions [FFR(−)MT] and those with only FFR-positive lesions (≤0.80) who underwent complete revascularization [FFR(+)CR] and were followed until July 1, 2015. The primary end point was the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), a composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI), target lesion (FFR assessed) revascularization, and rehospitalization for acute coronary syndrome. A total of 294 patients, 205 (69.7%) versus 89 (30.3%) in FFR(−)MT and FFR(+)CR, respectively, were analyzed. At a mean follow-up of 32.6 ± 18.1 months, FFR(−)MT was associated with higher MACE rate 44.0% versus 26.6% (log-rank p = 0.02, Cox regression–adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 2.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.21 to 3.33, p <0.01), and driven by both safety and efficacy end points: death/MI (HR 2.02, 95% CI 1.06 to 3.86, p = 0.03), rehospitalization for acute coronary syndrome (HR 2.06, 95% CI 1.03 to 4.10, p = 0.04), and target lesion revascularization (HR 3.38, 95% CI 1.19 to 9.64, p = 0.02). Previous MI was a strong effect modifier within the FFR(−)MT group (HR 1.98, 95% CI 1.26 to 3.13, p <0.01), whereas this was not the case in the FFR(+)CR group (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.27 to 1.62, p = 0.37). Significant interaction for MACE was present between FFR groups and previous MI (p = 0.03). In conclusion, in patients with DM, particularly those with previous MI, deferred revascularization is associated with poor medium-term outcomes. Combining FFR with imaging techniques may be required to guide our treatment strategy in these patients with high-risk, fast-progressing atherosclerosis.
DOI
10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.07.059
WOS
WOS:000387937700004
Archivio
http://hdl.handle.net/11368/2962653
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/scopus/2-s2.0-84992482422
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002914916313297?via=ihub
Diritti
open access
license:copyright editore
license:digital rights management non definito
FVG url
https://arts.units.it/request-item?handle=11368/2962653
Soggetti
  • Aged

  • Atherosclerosi

  • Cardiovascular Diseas...

  • Coronary Angiography

  • Diabetes Mellitu

  • Female

  • Human

  • Incidence

  • Male

  • Myocardial Revascular...

  • Patient Readmission

  • Prognosi

  • Risk Assessment

  • Risk Factor

  • Severity of Illness I...

  • Treatment Outcome

  • Fractional Flow Reser...

Scopus© citazioni
13
Data di acquisizione
Jun 14, 2022
Vedi dettagli
Web of Science© citazioni
19
Data di acquisizione
Mar 12, 2024
google-scholar
Get Involved!
  • Source Code
  • Documentation
  • Slack Channel
Make it your own

DSpace-CRIS can be extensively configured to meet your needs. Decide which information need to be collected and available with fine-grained security. Start updating the theme to match your nstitution's web identity.

Need professional help?

The original creators of DSpace-CRIS at 4Science can take your project to the next level, get in touch!

Realizzato con Software DSpace-CRIS - Estensione mantenuta e ottimizzata da 4Science

  • Impostazioni dei cookie
  • Informativa sulla privacy
  • Accordo con l'utente finale
  • Invia il tuo Feedback