The current predominant approach to neuroimaging data analysis is to use voxels as units of computation in a mass univariate approach which does not appropriately account for the existing spatial correlation and is plagued by problems of multiple comparisons. Therefore, there is a need to explore alternative approaches for inference on neuroimaging data that accurately model spatial autocorrelation, potentially providing better type I error control and more sensitive inference. In this project we examine the performance of a trend surface modeling (TSM) approach that is based on a biologically relevant parcellation of the brain. We present our results from applying the TSM to both task fMRI and resting-state fMRI and compare the latter to the results from the parametric software, FSL. We demonstrate that the TSM provides better Type I error control, as well as sensitive inference on task data.
The current predominant approach to neuroimaging data analysis is to use voxels as units of computation in a mass univariate approach which does not appropriately account for the existing spatial correlation and is plagued by problems of multiple comparisons. Therefore, there is a need to explore alternative approaches for inference on neuroimaging data that accurately model spatial autocorrelation, potentially providing better type I error control and more sensitive inference. In this project we examine the performance of a trend surface modeling (TSM) approach that is based on a biologically relevant parcellation of the brain. We present our results from applying the TSM to both task fMRI and resting-state fMRI and compare the latter to the results from the parametric software, FSL. We demonstrate that the TSM provides better Type I error control, as well as sensitive inference on task data.
