Objectives: Wake-up Stroke (WUS) accounts for about 25% of all ischemic strokes. Differences according to sex in the WUS subgroup has been poorly investigated so far, so we aimed to assess these differences by differentiating the enrolled population based on treatment administered. Materials & methods: We retrospectively analysed clinical and imaging data of WUS patients admitted to our hospital between November 2013 and December 2018 dividing them in two groups: rTPA-treated and non-rTPA treated group. To point out outcome differences we evaluated: NIHSS at 7 days or at discharge, mRS at discharge and ΔNIHSS. Results: We enrolled 149 WUS patients, 74 rTPA treated and 75 non-rTPA treated. Among rTPA treated patients, time from last known well (LKW) to Emergency Department (ED) admission was longer in females than males (610 vs 454 min), while females had a higher ΔNIHSS than males (5 vs 3). Finally, among non-rTPA treated patients, females were older than males (85 vs 79 years), had a higher pre-admission mRS (although very low in both cases), had a longer length of stay (17 vs 13 days) and shown a higher NIHSS at discharge (4 vs 2) compared to males. Conclusions: Females not receiving thrombolytic treatment had worse functional outcome than males, showing a higher NIHSS at discharge but, in contrast, when treated with rTPA they showed better neurological recovery as measured by a greater ΔNIHSS. We emphasize the importance of a prompt recognition of WUS in females since they seem to benefit more from rTPA treatment.
