Within the abstract, the following phrase in the ‘Methods’ section “According to FED trajectory, patients were classified as (i) dose (FED increase by ≥ 50% or newly initiated);” was corrected to read “According to FED trajectory, patients were classified as (i) dose ↑ (FED increase by ≥ 50% or newly initiated);”. In the ‘Results’ section of the abstract, the sentence “Baseline FED was independently associated with outcome (HR per 20 mg increase: 1.12 [95% CI 1.04–1.22, p = 0.003].” was corrected to “Baseline FED was independently associated with outcome (HR per 20 mg increase: 1.12 [95% CI 1.04–1.22], p = 0.003).” Finally, in Table 1, the LVEF, % for Dose↓ patients was given incorrectly whenit should have been “28 (22-34)” and the N value has been corrected from “263” to “282”. The original article has been corrected.
