Analytic metaphysics has been criticized for its dubious epistemological status. Today, anti-metaphysical sentiments often promote naturalized metaphysics as the only viable way to metaphysical theorizing. In this paper, I argue that analytic metaphysics (or at least a significant portion of it) has the same kind of legitimacy that naturalized metaphysics exhibits. I first point out that naturalized metaphysics is secured by the de facto legitimacy of natural science and its continuity with it.
Then, I argue that analytic metaphysics can pursue a similar strategy by relying on the de facto legitimacy of logic. To achieve this result I propose to interpret analytic metaphysics as philosophy of logic.
