In space and time utopias one line of thought requires the capability of classifying
and distinguishing. In order that it be fruitful and not purely theoretical a flexible definition of
boundaries is needed so that the fuzziness of actual life may be preserved. Mathematics
supplies some consistent definitions that can be tailored in order to correspond to real
experience. In the paper some critical examples are shown, that prove that the concept of
boundary is very sophisticated and by no means completely intuitive. Examples of spatial
boundaries are given, namely hard boundaries versus distributed boundaries. The section on
time boundaries is founded on de Saussure’s distinction between synchrony and diacrony.
Total isocronies seldom happen but psycologically some form of isocrony is constantly
perceived. The reconstruction of past very often must follow an erratic system of
comparisons, similar in some ways to CPM technique of project management of operation
research. Boundaries therefore become very fuzzy and very subjective, as literature and
psychology show.
