The analysis of residual life expectancy evolution at retirement age holds great importance for life insurers and pension schemes. Over the last 30 years, numerous models for forecasting mortality have been introduced, and those that allow us to predict the mortality of two or more related populations simultaneously are particularly important. Indeed, these models, in addition to improving the forecasting accuracy overall, enable evaluation of the basis risk in index-based longevity risk transfer deals. This paper implements and compares several model-averaging approaches in a two-population context. These approaches generate predictions for life expectancy and the Gini index by averaging the forecasts obtained using a set of two-population models. In order to evaluate the
eventual gain of model-averaging approaches for mortality forecasting, we quantitatively compare their performance to that of the individual two-population models using a large sample of different countries and periods. The results show that, overall, model-averaging approaches are superior both in terms of mean absolute forecasting error and interval forecast accuracy.
