Systematic review and meta-analysis on the adverse events of rimonabant treatment: considerations for its potential use in hepatology. 2009 Oc FI, 9;9:75.
Page 1 of 9
(page number not for citation purposes)
BMC Gastroenterology
Research article Open Access
Systematic review and meta-analysis on the adverse events of
rimonabant treatment: Considerations for its potential use in
hepatology
Norberto C Chavez-Tapia*1, Felix I Tellez-Avila2, Giorgio Bedogni1,
Lory S Crocè1,3, Flora Masutti1 and Claudio Tiribelli1,3
Address: 1Centro Studi Fegato (CSF) - Liver Research Center, Bldg Q - AREA Science Park-Basovizza Campus, Italy, 2Department of
Gastroenterology Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, México and 3Department ACADEM, University of Trieste,
Italy
Email: Norberto C Chavez-Tapia* - khavez@gmail.com; Felix I Tellez-Avila - felixtelleza@gmail.com;
Giorgio Bedogni - giorgiobedogni@gmail.com; Lory S Crocè - l.croce@csf.units.it; Flora Masutti - fmasutti@csf.units.it;
Claudio Tiribelli - ctliver@csf.units.it
* Corresponding author
Abstract
Background: The cannabinoid-1 receptor blockers have been proposed in the management of
obesity and obesity-related liver diseases (fatty liver as NAFLD or NASH). Due to increasing
number of patients to be potentially treated and the need to assess the advantage of this treatment
in terms of risk/benefit, we analyze the side events reported during the treatment with rimonabant
by a systematic review and meta-analysis of all randomized controlled studies.
Methods: All published randomized controlled trials using rimonabant versus placebo in adult
subjects were retrieved. Relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence interval for relevant adverse
events and number needed to harm was calculated.
Results: Nine trials (n = 9635) were considered. Rimonabant 20 mg was associated with an
increased risk of adverse event (RR 1.35; 95%CI 1.17-1.56), increased discontinuation rate (RR
1.79; 95%CI 1.35-2.38), psychiatric (RR 2.35; 95%CI 1.66-3.34), and nervous system adverse events
(RR 2.35; 95%CI 1.49-3.70). The number needed to harm for psychiatric adverse events is 30.
Conclusion: Rimonabant is associated with an increased risk of adverse events. Despite of an
increasing interest for its use on fatty liver, the security profile and efficacy it is needs to be carefully
assessed before its recommendation. At present the use of rimonabant on fatty liver cannot be
recommended.