Bortezomib with thalidomide plus dexamethasone compared with thalidomide plus dexamethasone as induction before, and consolidation after, double autologous stem cell transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a randomized phase 3 study.

Summary Background Thalidomide plus dexamethasone (TD) is a standard induction therapy for myeloma. We aimed to assess the effi cacy and safety of addition of bortezomib to TD (VTD) versus TD alone as induction therapy before, and consolidation therapy after, double autologous stem-cell transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Methods Patients (aged 18–65 years) with previously untreated symptomatic myeloma were enrolled from 73 sites in Italy between May, 2006, and April, 2008, and data collection continued until June 30, 2010. Patients were randomly allocated (1:1 ratio) by a web-based system to receive three 21-day cycles of thalidomide (100 mg daily for the fi rst 14 days and 200 mg daily thereafter) plus dexamethasone (40 mg daily on 8 of the fi rst 12 days, but not consecutively; total of 320 mg per cycle), either alone or with bortezomib (1·3 mg/m2 on days 1, 4, 8, and 11). The randomisation sequence was computer generated by the study coordinating team and was stratifi ed by disease stage. After double autologous stem-cell transplantation, patients received two 35-day cycles of their assigned drug regimen, VTD or TD, as consolidation therapy. The primary endpoint was the rate of complete or near complete response to induction therapy. Analysis was by intention to treat. Patients and treating physicians were not masked to treatment allocation. This study is still underway but is not recruiting participants, and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01134484, and with EudraCT, number 2005-003723-39. Findings 480 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive VTD (n=241 patients) or TD (n=239). Six patients withdrew consent before start of treatment, and 236 on VTD and 238 on TD were included in the intentionto- treat analysis. After induction therapy, complete or near complete response was achieved in 73 patients (31%, 95% CI 25·0–36·8) receiving VTD, and 27 (11%, 7·3–15·4) on TD (p<0·0001). Grade 3 or 4 adverse events were recorded in a signifi cantly higher number of patients on VTD (n=132, 56%) than in those on TD (n=79, 33%; p<0·0001), with a higher occurrence of peripheral neuropathy in patients on VTD (n=23, 10%) than in those on TD (n=5, 2%; p=0·0004). Resolution or improvement of severe peripheral neuropathy was recorded in 18 of 23 patients on VTD, and in three of fi ve patients on TD. Interpretation VTD induction therapy before double autologous stem-cell transplantation signifi cantly improves rate of complete or near complete response, and represents a new standard of care for patients with multiple myeloma who are eligible for transplant.