Logo del repository
  1. Home
 
Opzioni

EAES classification of intraoperative adverse events in laparoscopic surgery

Francis, N. K.
•
Curtis, N. J.
•
Conti, J. A.
altro
Yiannakopoulou, E.
2018
  • journal article

Periodico
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Surgical outcomes are traditionally evaluated by post-operative data such as histopathology and morbidity. Although these outcomes are reported using accepted systems, their ability to influence operative performance is limited by their retrospective application. Interest in direct measurement of intraoperative events is growing but no available systems applicable to routine practice exist. We aimed to develop a structured, practical method to report intraoperative adverse events enacted during minimal access surgical procedures. METHODS: A structured mixed methodology approach was adopted. Current intraoperative adverse event reporting practices and desirable system characteristics were sought through a survey of the EAES executive. The observational clinical human reliability analysis method was applied to a series of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) case videos to identify intraoperative adverse events. In keeping with survey results, observed events were further categorised into non-consequential and consequential, which were further subdivided into four levels based upon the principle of therapy required to correct the event. A second survey phase explored usability, acceptability, face and content validity of the novel classification. RESULTS: 217 h of TME surgery were analysed to develop and continually refine the five-point hierarchical structure. 34 EAES expert surgeons (69%) responded. The lack of an accepted system was the main barrier to routine reporting. Simplicity, repro- ducibility and clinical utility were identified as essential requirements. The observed distribution of intraoperative adverse events was 60.1% grade I (non-consequential), 37.1% grade II (minor corrective action), 2.4% grade III (major correction or change in post-operative care) and 0.1% grade IV (life threatening). 84% agreed with the proposed classification (Likert scale 4.04) and 92% felt it was applicable to their practice and incorporated all desirable characteristics. CONCLUSION: A clinically applicable intraoperative adverse event classification, which is acceptable to expert surgeons, is reported and complements the objective assessment of minimal access surgical performance.
DOI
10.1007/s00464-018-6108-1
WOS
WOS:000440416500010
Archivio
http://hdl.handle.net/11368/2948772
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/scopus/2-s2.0-85041901147
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00464-018-6108-1
Diritti
closed access
license:copyright editore
license:digital rights management non definito
FVG url
https://arts.units.it/request-item?handle=11368/2948772
Soggetti
  • Adverse event

  • Classification

  • EAES

  • Intraoperative

  • Laparoscopic

  • Morbidity

  • Surgery

Web of Science© citazioni
27
Data di acquisizione
Jan 30, 2024
google-scholar
Get Involved!
  • Source Code
  • Documentation
  • Slack Channel
Make it your own

DSpace-CRIS can be extensively configured to meet your needs. Decide which information need to be collected and available with fine-grained security. Start updating the theme to match your nstitution's web identity.

Need professional help?

The original creators of DSpace-CRIS at 4Science can take your project to the next level, get in touch!

Realizzato con Software DSpace-CRIS - Estensione mantenuta e ottimizzata da 4Science

  • Impostazioni dei cookie
  • Informativa sulla privacy
  • Accordo con l'utente finale
  • Invia il tuo Feedback