The paper deals with three aspects of C. Vigna’s theory about transcendentality, which are considered a source of further issues: the phenomenological immediacy of the transcendentality of the other’s conscience; the supremacy of subjective transcendentality on classical transcendentalities, and, therefore, the semantics of desire. The focus of the debate is the alternative between the originality of transcendental meanings and intersubjective transcendentality.
