In this article, I will analyze Nozick's theory of justice, particularly his basic arguments, that of fair distribution in favor of Wilt Chamberlain, that of forced labor, that Kantian, to show the difficul-ties of such a libertarian conception, which I consider unacceptable. Next, I will show, on the basis of six arguments why a liberal-egalitarian conception is preferable, a welfare of fundamental rights, liberty and social rights, as provided in many Western constitutions. Finally, I will conclude by saying how some forms of unequal distribution of wealth can be justified, based on four argu-ments.
