BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY
Abstract
Objective To explore the attitudes of obstetricians to performe a
caesarean section on maternal request in the absence of medical
indication.
Design Cluster sampling cross-sectional survey.
Setting Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) associated maternity
units in eight European countries.
Population Obstetricians with at least 6 months clinical
experience.
Methods NICU-associated maternity units were chosen by census
in Luxembourg, Netherlands and Sweden and by geographically
stratified random sampling in France, Germany, Italy, Spain and
UK. An anonymous, self-administered questionnaire was used for
data collection.
Main outcome measures Obstetricians’ willingness to perform
a caesarean section on maternal request.
Results One hundred and five units and 1530 obstetricians
participated in the study (response rates of 70 and 77%,
respectively). Compliance with a hypothetical woman’s request for
elective caesarean section simply because it was ‘her choice’ was
lowest in Spain (15%), France (19%) and Netherlands (22%);
highest in Germany (75%) and UK (79%) and intermediate in
the remaining countries. Using weighted multivariate logistic
regression, country of practice (P < 0.001), fear of litigation
(P = 0.004) and working in a university-affiliated hospital
(P = 0.001) were associated with physicians’ likelihood to agree
to patient’s request. The subset of female doctors with children
was less likely to agree (OR 0.29, 95% CI 0.20–0.42).
Conclusions The differences in obstetricians’ attitudes are not
founded on concrete medical evidence. Cultural factors, legal
liability and variables linked to the specific perinatal care
organisation of the various countries play a role. Greater emphasis
should be placed on understanding the motivation, values and
fears underlying a woman’s request for elective caesarean delivery.