Logo del repository
  1. Home
 
Opzioni

Secondary Endovascular Repair of Recurring Lesions and Perioperative Complications after Open Aortic Repair: The Complementary Role of Different Technical Solutions

D'Oria M
•
Mastrorill D
•
Calvagna C
altro
Griselli F
2020
  • journal article

Periodico
ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY
Abstract
Background: The aim of our article was to describe the complementary role of different technical solutions for secondary endovascular repair of recurring lesions and perioperative complications after open aortic repair (OAR). Methods: We describe our clinical experience of secondary endovascular repair after OAR. We included in the analysis all consecutive patients who presented recurring lesions and perioperative complications after OAR and underwent secondary endovascular repair between January 1, 2015 and June 31, 2018. Both elective and nonelective cases were captured. Early end points were technical success, 30-day mortality, 30-day major adverse events, and 30-day vascular access complications. Late end points were survival and freedom from secondary interventions. Results: Three different techniques were used in 6 patients: 2 cases of fenestrated–branched endovascular aortic repair (F-BEVAR), 2 cases of parallel-graft EVAR (pg-EVAR), and 2 cases of off-label use of standard devices. Technical success was 100%. One patient died within 30 days from acute pulmonary embolism. One patient developed acute kidney injury not requiring renal replacement therapy, whereas the remaining 4 patients were free from 30-day major adverse events. The cumulative rate of 30-day vascular access complications was 0%. All the 5 patients who survived the index hospitalization had ≥12 months of clinical and imaging follow-up. At the longest individual follow-up, they all were alive and free from secondary interventions. Computed tomography angiography showed in all cases sustained clinical success. Conclusions: Secondary endovascular repair of recurring lesions and perioperative complications after OAR is safe and feasible and offers a minimally invasive effective treatment option when a redo surgical operation would be associated with a considerable risk to the patient. Different solutions are available (including F-BEVAR, pg-EVAR, and off-label use of standard devices) and are complementary rather than competitive. Careful preoperative assessment and familiarity with advanced techniques are essential to achieve satisfactory outcomes.
DOI
10.1016/j.avsg.2019.06.015
WOS
WOS:000512931700009
Archivio
https://hdl.handle.net/11368/3097063
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/scopus/2-s2.0-85072511907
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0890509619305904?via=ihub
Diritti
closed access
license:copyright editore
license uri:iris.pri02
FVG url
https://arts.units.it/request-item?handle=11368/3097063
Soggetti
  • endovascular repair

  • secondary interventio...

google-scholar
Get Involved!
  • Source Code
  • Documentation
  • Slack Channel
Make it your own

DSpace-CRIS can be extensively configured to meet your needs. Decide which information need to be collected and available with fine-grained security. Start updating the theme to match your nstitution's web identity.

Need professional help?

The original creators of DSpace-CRIS at 4Science can take your project to the next level, get in touch!

Realizzato con Software DSpace-CRIS - Estensione mantenuta e ottimizzata da 4Science

  • Impostazioni dei cookie
  • Informativa sulla privacy
  • Accordo con l'utente finale
  • Invia il tuo Feedback