Moreso’s metaethical works revolve around a central theme: the attempt to outline an ‘ecumen-ical’ metaethical proposal that could be embraced independently—at least to some extent—of the positions defended within the major divisions of the metaethical debate: cognitivism/non-cognitivism, realism/anti-realism. In this article, I reconstruct the basic features of Moreso’s me-ta ethical ecumenism and the concerns it addresses. I then raise some objections. I conclude by arguing that Moreso could still achieve all that he cares about even if he abandoned the most problematic tenet of his ecumenical attempts, namely, a certain, very robust conception of ob-jectivity in ethics.
