Logo del repository
  1. Home
 
Opzioni

Noninvasive Estimation of Aortic Stiffness Through Different Approaches

Salvi, Paolo
•
Scalise, Filippo
•
Rovina, Matteo
altro
Parati, Gianfranco
2019
  • journal article

Periodico
HYPERTENSION
Abstract
Aortic pulse wave velocity is a worldwide accepted index to evaluate aortic stiffness and can be assessed noninvasively by several methods. This study sought to determine if commonly used noninvasive devices can all accurately estimate aortic pulse wave velocity. Pulse wave velocity was estimated in 102 patients (aged 65 +/- 13 years) undergoing diagnostic coronary angiography with 7 noninvasive devices and compared with invasive aortic pulse wave velocity. Devices evaluating carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (Complior Analyse, PulsePen ET, PulsePen ETT, and SphygmoCor) showed a strong agreement between each other (r>0.83) and with invasive aortic pulse wave velocity. The mean difference +/- SD with the invasive pulse wave velocity was -0.73 +/- 2.83 m/s (r=0.64) for Complior-Analyse: 0.20 +/- 2.54 m/s (r=0.71) for PulsePen-ETT: -0.04 +/- 2.33 m/s (r=0.78) for PulsePen ET; and -0.61 +/- 2.57 m/s (r=0.70) for SphygmoCor. The finger-toe pulse wave velocity, evaluated by pOpmetre, showed only a weak relationship with invasive aortic recording (mean difference +/- SD =-0.44 +/- 4.44 m/s; r=0.41), and with noninvasive carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity measurements (r<0.33). Pulse wave velocity estimated through a proprietary algorithm by BPLab (v.5.03 and v.6.02) and Mobil-O-Graph showed a weaker agreement with invasive pulse wave velocity compared with carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (mean difference +/- SD =-0.71 +/- 3.55 m/s, r=0.23; 1.04 +/- 2.27 m/s, r=0.77; and -1.01 +/- 2.54 m/s, r=0.71, respectively), revealing a negative proportional bias at Bland-Altman plot. Aortic pulse wave velocity values provided by BPLab and Mobil-O-Graph were entirely dependent on age-squared and peripheral systolic blood pressure (cumulative r(2)=0.98 and 0.99, respectively). Thus, among the methods evaluated, only those assessing carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (Complior Analyse, PulsePen ETT, PulsePen ET, and SphygmoCor) appear to be reliable approaches for estimation of aortic stiffness.
DOI
10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.12853
WOS
WOS:000471117100021
Archivio
https://hdl.handle.net/11368/3038220
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/scopus/2-s2.0-85068198336
https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.12853
Diritti
open access
license:copyright editore
license:copyright editore
license:digital rights management non definito
license uri:iris.pri02
license uri:iris.pri02
license uri:iris.pri00
FVG url
https://arts.units.it/request-item?handle=11368/3038220
Soggetti
  • arteriosclerosi

  • cardiac catheterizati...

  • coronary angiography

  • coronary artery disea...

  • hemodynamic

  • pulse wave velocity

  • vascular stiffness

google-scholar
Get Involved!
  • Source Code
  • Documentation
  • Slack Channel
Make it your own

DSpace-CRIS can be extensively configured to meet your needs. Decide which information need to be collected and available with fine-grained security. Start updating the theme to match your nstitution's web identity.

Need professional help?

The original creators of DSpace-CRIS at 4Science can take your project to the next level, get in touch!

Realizzato con Software DSpace-CRIS - Estensione mantenuta e ottimizzata da 4Science

  • Impostazioni dei cookie
  • Informativa sulla privacy
  • Accordo con l'utente finale
  • Invia il tuo Feedback