The article attempts a critical comparison with Totaro’s arguments, of which ap preciates the high level of philosophy. It covers three main points: the concept ion of the unconditioned, the relation of the finite with the absolute and the p erspectivism of truth. Very convincing are the defense of the ontological approa ch and the attempt to found ethics on the ontology. Just the close relationship between ethics and ontology should orient toward the affirmation of freedom as t he original principle. Finally, it seeks to show that the perspectivism of truth is better es-tablished in a hermeneutics that does not dissolve the truth but th ink it as inexhaustible.
