Logo del repository
  1. Home
 
Opzioni

Further Thoughts on A-Legality, Exemplarity and Constituent Power: Responding to Hans Lindahl

Ferrara, Alessandro
2020
  • Controlled Vocabulary...

Periodico
Etica & Politica / Ethics & Politics
Abstract
The paper is a response to H.Lindahl’s extensive reply to Ferrara’s critical remarks. This reply was published as part of a larger symposium (in Etica & Politica/Ethics & Politics XXI, 2019, 3) on Lindahl’s recently published Authority and the Globalisation of Inclusion and Exclusion. In an effort to push the dialogue further, new reflections and counterarguments are here put forward in relation to four thematic areas: a) the notion of a-legality, revisited in light of a distinction between foreground and background assumptions of a practice; b) exemplarity, positive and negative, in law, c) the paradox of constituent power, and d) the relation of Lindahl’s notion of “collective self-restraint” to the later Rawls’s paradigm of “political liberalism”.
DOI
10.13137/1825-5167/31005
Archivio
http://hdl.handle.net/10077/31005
Diritti
open access
Soggetti
  • A-legality

  • Exemplarity

  • Constituent power

  • Political Liberalism

  • Rawls

Visualizzazioni
1
Data di acquisizione
Apr 19, 2024
Vedi dettagli
google-scholar
Get Involved!
  • Source Code
  • Documentation
  • Slack Channel
Make it your own

DSpace-CRIS can be extensively configured to meet your needs. Decide which information need to be collected and available with fine-grained security. Start updating the theme to match your nstitution's web identity.

Need professional help?

The original creators of DSpace-CRIS at 4Science can take your project to the next level, get in touch!

Realizzato con Software DSpace-CRIS - Estensione mantenuta e ottimizzata da 4Science

  • Impostazioni dei cookie
  • Informativa sulla privacy
  • Accordo con l'utente finale
  • Invia il tuo Feedback